|
It's moderately common to find girls wearing anti-male, hate clothing.
By Brian Simpson (pseudonym)
I've been a supply teacher for
20 years in every subject area, K-12 in over 200 schools and in over
1000 classrooms in a large Canadian city. I can report that the
education system has been taken over by feminists and lesbians who
preach a daily diet of hate, violence and discrimination against males
despite pretenses of “tolerance” “non violence” and “inclusiveness.”
It's
moderately common to find girls wearing anti-male, hate clothing.
Slogans on T-Shirts include: “Stupid Factory:Where Boys are Made;”
“BOYS ARE STUPID, THROW ROCKS AT THEM!” and (prefixed by the profile
view of a handgun) “He had it comin'”
Others include “WHO
NEEDS BOYS WHEN YOU HAVE CREDIT CARDS?” and “I LIKE BOYS WHO ARE
SENSITIVE AND CRY, WHEN i HIT THEM;” and “MENtal Anxiety MENtal
Breakdown MENstrual Cramps MENopause Did you ever notice how all our
problems begin with MEN.”
Can you imagine if these comments were addressed at girls?
I've
been in staff rooms where I have read pamphlets issued by the Canadian
Federation of Teachers about Afghanistan. Exclusive concern was shown
for women, girls and female babies and none for males despite the fact
that boys had the double-whammy-plus of being forced to carry a gun,
kill and be killed, traumatize and be traumatized, starting as early as
eight-years-of-age. They had been denied schooling and been
traumatized for life. The girls only had been denied schooling.
I've
been in classrooms where videos were shown blaming all date violence on
males. No sexual violence female-to-male was mentioned and women were
referred to as "men's property." Once the video had been shown, the
girls overflowed with anti-male hate statements and the boys were
afraid to speak on any matter. I told students that the video's
depiction was false but they insisted that the video depiction was the
absolute truth. Such indoctrination is the norm in schools.
In
the context of the omni-present, "Women's History Month" posters in the
school, I have been in homerooms in which the boys are so abused by
their feminist teachers that they cannot even whimper, even after
serial attempts to get them to say anything at all. In one classroom
in which Grade-12 students were nearing their graduation, I had a boy
cry about the climate of ever-climaxing anti-male hate.
EMPLOYMENT
As a male, I am routinely discriminated against for employment with no recourse to authorities.
In
supply teaching, patterns emerge such as gender-cleansing in the early
years (Men need not apply.) The substitute clerks want women, and when
they can't get them (a rarity), a man can get called at the last minute
(late calls generally translate as, "I-couldn't-get-a-woman call").
In
my experience, all substitute clerks are women. In the last two
decades, phone/computer machines have been put into place in various
districts. As a result, when IT phones instead of SHE, the early years
open up to men, initially. The resultant realization that the
conventional gender-cleansing is not in place results in male supply
teachers being "greeted" by school secretaries (always women) who ask
the man reporting to the office in the morning, "What are YOU doing
here?" "I'm here for____(a woman teacher)."
In response to
that, the secretary reports the man to the principal who tries to
gender-cleanse by saying to the male supply teacher, "I can give you
Grade 5." "No, thanks, I'll take the Kindergartens." I've even had to
discuss such matters for two minutes with some principals.
In
the hundreds and hundreds of applications I have put into for teaching
jobs, I have never had a response to any application for Grade 2, Grade
1 nor Kindergarten; and I've only had one interview for a position in
Grade 3--which was assigned to a woman.
FACULTY OF EDUCATION
Here are some of my experiences as an Education student.
First
of all, to be in teaching is to be immersed in femininity.
Wall-to-wall women, everywhere; the students, the teaching staff, the
curriculum, the posters on walls, the celebrations, the laments, the
teacher unions, the student unions, the union unions. In perfect
lock-step, all are one, and half of humanity counts for nothing, except
to be harmed, of course.
In one class, the professor had
issued a 4-page photocopy to all students (26 women and 3 men in the
room). The article was composed entirely of assertions. There was a
perfect void of evidence. The essence of the article was that men,
most especially white men were all advantaged and that women were all
disadvantaged.
The monomania was so advanced that one black
woman complained that whereas there was affirmative action for women,
including black women, it was mostly Caribbean black women who got the
jobs and not the African black women. The women in the room gushed
with sympathy that such a situation could persist in Canada. Various
women-as-victim and men-as-victimizer as the universally advantaged had
serialized. I waited for an almost void in the lament and had declared
various facts.
I pointed out that in Canada's armed services,
over 116 000 men and boys and only 30 women and no girls had been
killed in service and that the response of governments in Canada and
elsewhere the world over had been one of, "Advance women."
I
pointed out that in the civilian work world, up to 2005, just over 96%
of job-caused deaths were male and that as of 2006, with the boom in
the economy, for the first time, just over 1000 men and only
approximately 20 women were killed.
The women who spoke
(about 12 of them), utterly whaled against me in seething frenzied
hate. It was like being in a Nazi Party meeting. I was
shouted-down. In fact, the women who insisted that the proper world
order was save-the-women/kill-the-men, complained vociferously to the
knights in shining armor (the few men who were allowed into the
teaching faculty.)
These professor men called me at home on a
Sunday to set up a meeting to censor me for raising gender issues!.
They didn't complain about what the women were doing.
The one
male professor encouraged me to get out of teaching by way of using the
university employment service (a feminist organization.)
I told
them that in every case, I was responding to the women who had raised
the issues in the first place and that they had to back off. The head
professor said he would speak with the professors. But, following that
meeting, my classroom curricula had included one article about suicide
which mentioned that female depression was 50% higher than male
depression, but did not mention that male suicide was 400% higher than
female suicide.
Another professor issued learning-outcome
statements to the class which counselled us to include examples of
women (and not examples of men).
OTHER HARASSMENT
Previous
to that event, we teacher-students were shown a video of two teachers
in team teaching. The woman teacher in the video had the line assigned
to her, "I hope I'm treated as an equal (by the man teacher)" and the
man teacher was assigned the line, "I'll have to guard against my male
ego."
The same female professor who had presented that video
had chosen a text book which included curricular topics for lesson
plans. The topics included, "Violence against Women" (and, of course,
no concern for "Violence against Men").
During one
presentation, a mother of a disabled daughter told how some, "ardent
Feminist" women had taken her daughter to a male strip joint. Such was
described by the mother as, "wonderful." Following that, the same
"ardent Feminist" woman had taken her daughter to the USA to attend a
Feminist, "woman's music camp" and we were shown a slide of those
women, many of whom were topless. Evidently lesbianism is encouraged.
"So,
why didn't you complain to officials of the university or elsewhere?"
My answer is as follows: The student union had a handbook which blamed
all date violence on men and its front office window had three
prominently displayed posters about date violence which blamed into all
on men. Also, annually, the union had taken part in the Marc Lepine
remembrance day ceremonies at the university...which blamed everything
on men. As for the university, it had Women's Studies and no Men's
Studies, and a , "Womyn's Center" and no Men's Center. The, poster,
"greeting" men to the Womyn's Centre" reads:
MEN:
Welcome to the Womyn's Centre
This is a SAFE PLACE for Womyn
and Womyn identified people only.
MEN are asked to KNOCK before entering and to use the space briefly
Only to access the resources such as: pamphlets, free stuff and books in the Library.
Thank you for your respect and understanding.
To the above, I can only say, "No thanks for the disrespect and hate." Source: Henry Makow
|
Life & Society 
